Draft a methodology disclosure
Helps teams publish how a comparison was made without slipping into aggregate ratings theater.
Draft a methodology disclosure for an AI comparison write-up.
What we compared: [tools/models]
Job or peer group: [job]
Evidence used: [docs, trials, benchmarks — list]
Evidence not used: [list]
Edition or date of sources: [date]
Commercial relationship: [none | disclosed — describe]
Rules:
- No ranked-list or aggregate-rating schema.
- Say money never buys rank if this touches AIScoreboard-style publishing.
- Do not claim peer-reviewed status unless true.
Return:
1) 120–180 word disclosure
2) 3 FAQ pairs (including “Is this a ranked endorsement?” → No…)
3) A one-line banner: what would change the conclusionsAbout this template
Reason
Helps teams publish how a comparison was made without slipping into aggregate ratings theater.
Outcome
A disclosure paragraph and FAQ suitable for a report footer.
Insight
State what was not measured. Readers trust limits they can see.
These templates are starting points for your own work. They are not ranked, scored, or sold. AIScoreboard does not crown a “best prompt.” Money never buys rank, and these pages have no Stripe checkout or paywall.