MODEL PROFILE / EDITION 2026.09
Claude Opus 4.7
Long-lived integrations that need a stable, heavily validated Claude with good visual taste
Balanced model evidence score; rank 22. No rank delta is shown because there is no prior numeric snapshot.
Best for
Long-lived integrations that need a stable, heavily validated Claude with good visual taste
Price & access
$5 in / $25 out per 1M; cache read $0.50, cache write $6.25
Evidence summary
Bedrock card, Anthropic pricing, the largest Arena sample in the Anthropic family, Design Arena and two third-party leaderboards.
Edition status
No prior snapshot. Tracked in the September 2026 baseline.
Strengths
- Best-sampled Anthropic Arena row in this set (14,142 votes, +/-6)
- Design Arena Website 1310 beats Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 5
- SWE-bench Verified 87.6% with a documented Adaptive mode
- Lowest TTFT of the Opus tier (24.39 s)
Tradeoffs
- Two generations behind Opus 5 at identical $5/$25 pricing
- Legacy on Anthropic's pricing page
- SWE-bench Pro 64.3% trails Opus 4.8's 69.2%
- Effort aliases are indistinguishable on Arena, complicating comparisons
Score profile
visual 71 · code 82 · agentic 79 · debug 76 · context 92 · speed 60 · value 55
Linked evidence
Evidence source 1 ↗Evidence source 2 ↗Evidence source 3 ↗Evidence source 4 ↗Evidence source 5 ↗Evidence source 6 ↗Evidence source 7 ↗Compare this model on the full scoreboard
Open comparison view →Use the same published data, filters, and side-by-side metrics.