none reviewed yet · 2 benchmark observations · latest capture Sep 8, 2026
Inspect the evidenceClaude Opus 5
Production teams that want near-flagship correctness at half of Fable pricing
Saved editorial fit for your current task lens; not a benchmark result
How scoring worksVerified rates (Sep 8, 2026) · 100 runs / month at your token settings
Adjust workloadAt a glance
9 facts- Provider
- Anthropic
- Type
- API model
- Access
- Anthropic API, Claude apps, AWS Bedrock, Claude Code
- Context
- 1,000,000 tokens
- Maximum output
- 128K tokens
- License / weights
- Proprietary
- Input modalities
- text, image, file
- Output modalities
- text
- Pricing notes
- $5 in / $25 out per 1M; cache read $0.50, cache write $6.25
The practical trade-offs
Documented strengths
- SWE-bench Verified 96% is the single highest coding score in this evidence base
- Best AA Coding Agent Index v1.4 (68.1) of any model in OpenAI's own table
- Half the token price of Fable 5.1 with a large, well-sampled Arena row (8,431 votes)
- Documented frontend QA behaviour: opened desktop and phone widths, found and fixed an off-screen checkout button
Limitations to check
- $5/$25 is still premium pricing
- TTFT 77.82 s at max effort
- Fable 5.1 beats it on SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 4.0, OSWorld and Design Arena
- Effort tier changes its Arena rank by 28 Elo (max vs high)
Evidence & conditions
- Evidence source 1
anthropic.comDate not recorded - Evidence source 2
docs.aws.amazon.comDate not recorded - Evidence source 3
anthropic.comDate not recorded - Evidence source 4
arena.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 5
benchlm.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 6
benchlm.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 7
artificialanalysis.aiDate not recorded
Benchmark observations
Terminal-Bench 4.0 Inspect conditions
- name
- Terminal-Bench 4.0
- value
- 52.6
- unit
- %
- source Url
- https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/
- checked At
- 2026-09-08T19:30:56Z
- attribution
- provider-reported
- configuration
- OpenAI comparative table, not an independent Anthropic verification; maximum across effort; competitor harness not specified.
DeepSWE v1.1 Inspect conditions
- name
- DeepSWE v1.1
- value
- 73.7
- unit
- %
- source Url
- https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/
- checked At
- 2026-09-08T19:30:56Z
- attribution
- provider-reported
- configuration
- OpenAI comparative table, not an independent Anthropic verification; maximum across effort; competitor harness not specified.
Source reports, measured results, and editorial assessments are separate evidence types. Source dates do not imply a new benchmark run. Capture dates are shown when recorded; otherwise we say the capture date was not recorded. Recorded dates are compared with this catalogue snapshot (Sep 11, 2026), not today’s date.
How this page is assessed
Quality claims follow Method AIS-V2.
Money never buys rank — commercial relationships cannot change rank, eligibility, evidence quality, or publication timing.
Submit or claim a listing is free and does not skip the editorial queue.