AI ScoreboardFrontend & Coding Index← Back to rankings

MODEL PROFILE / EDITION 2026.09

GLM-5.2

Teams that want an MIT-licensed, self-hostable model with good design taste and instant responses

Z.ai (Zhipu AI)Rank 19Confidence BNo prior snapshot
75.0

Balanced model evidence score; rank 19. No rank delta is shown because there is no prior numeric snapshot.

Best for

Teams that want an MIT-licensed, self-hostable model with good design taste and instant responses

Price & access

$1.40 in / $4.40 out per 1M with $0.26 cached input (Z.ai); Alibaba resale $1.40/$4.40 in Singapore and $1.10/$3.851 in China, Germany, US and Hong Kong; `glm-5.2-us` $1.40/$4.4

Evidence summary

Z.ai pricing page, Alibaba regional price rows, two preference boards, a third-party SWE-bench Pro placement and two vendor comparison tables. Licence (MIT) rests on Artificial Analysis rather than the model card.

Edition status

No prior snapshot. Tracked in the September 2026 baseline.

Strengths

  • Design Arena Website rank 8 (1315) - best open-weight design-preference score on that board
  • MIT licence with open weights and a 1M context
  • TTFT 1.60 s at 71.1 tok/s makes it feel immediate
  • SWE-bench Pro 62.1% at $1.40/$4.40 (or $1.10/$3.851 in several regions)

Tradeoffs

  • GLM-5.3 costs the same and is much stronger (DeepSWE 46.2 -> 66.9)
  • DeepSWE 46.2 and Terminal Bench 3.0 4.6 show weak long-horizon agentic coding
  • Text-only on the evidence available
  • AA non-reasoning row collapses to 26

Score profile

visual 76 · code 74 · agentic 68 · debug 68 · context 78 · speed 76 · value 88

Linked evidence

Evidence source 1 ↗Evidence source 2 ↗Evidence source 3 ↗Evidence source 4 ↗Evidence source 5 ↗Evidence source 6 ↗Evidence source 7 ↗Evidence source 8 ↗
Compare this model on the full scoreboard

Use the same published data, filters, and side-by-side metrics.

Open comparison view →