MODEL PROFILE / EDITION 2026.09
Grok 4.5
Teams that need a documented SWE-bench Pro number from xAI's line rather than 4.6's unpublished claims
Balanced model evidence score; rank 20. No rank delta is shown because there is no prior numeric snapshot.
Best for
Teams that need a documented SWE-bench Pro number from xAI's line rather than 4.6's unpublished claims
Price & access
$2 in / $6 out per 1M; cached input $0.30 (BenchLM notes this is a 10% cache-read estimate, not an xAI-published rate); higher-context pricing applies above 200K with an undisclosed surcharge
Evidence summary
A hard third-party SWE-bench Pro number plus two preference boards and first-party pricing, but the release date and AA index both have conflicting published values.
Edition status
No prior snapshot. Tracked in the September 2026 baseline.
Strengths
- SWE-bench Pro 64.7% (rank 10) beats GPT-5.6 Sol's 64.6% and Opus 4.7's 64.3%
- Roughly 2x token efficiency and under half the steps of comparable models per xAI
- Well-sampled Arena row (6,034 votes) and Design Arena 1301
- Same $2/$6 price as Grok 4.6
Tradeoffs
- Superseded by Grok 4.6, which scores higher on both preference boards at the same price
- AA publishes two conflicting Intelligence Index values (45 vs 56)
- 500K context with an undisclosed >200K surcharge
- Cached-input rate is an estimate, not an xAI-published price
Score profile
visual 71 · code 80 · agentic 78 · debug 74 · context 74 · speed 68 · value 78
Linked evidence
Evidence source 1 ↗Evidence source 2 ↗Evidence source 3 ↗Evidence source 4 ↗Evidence source 5 ↗Evidence source 6 ↗Use the same published data, filters, and side-by-side metrics.