none reviewed yet · 1 benchmark observation · latest capture Sep 8, 2026
Inspect the evidenceTencent Hy3
High-volume, cost-capped code and content generation where design quality is not critical
Saved editorial fit for your current task lens; not a benchmark result
How scoring worksVerified rates (Sep 8, 2026) · 100 runs / month at your token settings
Adjust workloadAt a glance
9 facts- Provider
- Tencent
- Type
- API model
- Access
- Tencent Cloud, WorkBuddy, CodeBuddy, self-hosting
- Context
- 262,144 tokens
- Maximum output
- n.a. on fetched pages
- License / weights
- Open weights
- Input modalities
- text
- Output modalities
- text
- Pricing notes
- $0.14 in / $0.55 out per 1M (Artificial Analysis) - the cheapest model in this set
The practical trade-offs
Documented strengths
- Cheapest tokens in this set ($0.14/$0.55) with Apache 2.0 weights
- 94.8 tok/s with 2.76 s TTFT - genuinely responsive
- SWE-bench Verified 74.4% is respectable for the price tier
- Free in Tencent's own dev products until Sep 30, 2026
Limitations to check
- Design Arena Website 1197 (rank 64) is the weakest visual score in this set
- 256k context is the smallest here
- AA Intelligence Index 33 is low
- The only SWE-bench row is labelled 'Preview', so it may not match GA hy3
Evidence & conditions
- Evidence source 1
artificialanalysis.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 2
arena.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 3
benchlm.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 4
benchlm.aiDate not recorded - Evidence source 5
tencent.comDate not recorded
Benchmark observations
Arena WebDev Frontend Inspect conditions
- name
- Arena WebDev Frontend
- value
- 1517
- unit
- arena_score
- source Url
- https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev/frontend
- checked At
- 2026-09-08T19:28:18Z
- attribution
- benchmark-publisher
- configuration
- Exact row hy3; source results dated 2026-09-05; human preference; confidence interval +/-13; 2576 votes. This is a checked source snapshot, not a newly run September 8 evaluation.
Source reports, measured results, and editorial assessments are separate evidence types. Source dates do not imply a new benchmark run. Capture dates are shown when recorded; otherwise we say the capture date was not recorded. Recorded dates are compared with this catalogue snapshot (Sep 11, 2026), not today’s date.
How this page is assessed
Quality claims follow Method AIS-V2.
Money never buys rank — commercial relationships cannot change rank, eligibility, evidence quality, or publication timing.
Submit or claim a listing is free and does not skip the editorial queue.