AI ScoreboardFrontend & Coding Index← Back to rankings

MODEL PROFILE / EDITION 2026.09

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Budget-conscious frontend teams and self-hosters who want frontier-adjacent UI quality

Alibaba (Qwen)Rank 9Confidence BNo prior snapshot
79.4

Balanced model evidence score; rank 9. No rank delta is shown because there is no prior numeric snapshot.

Best for

Budget-conscious frontend teams and self-hosters who want frontier-adjacent UI quality

Price & access

Hosted qwen3.8-flash $0.15 in / $0.47 out per 1M (Singapore/international; $0.113/$0.382 other regions); cache read $0.016, cache write $0.20; self-hosting has no token price

Evidence summary

Vendor model card, Alibaba pricing page and a detailed third-party teardown of the weights-vs-API split, plus Arena and AA. Benchmarks are vendor-run under the Claude Code harness, and licence terms come from a secondary analysis of the LICENSE file.

Edition status

No prior snapshot. Tracked in the September 2026 baseline.

Strengths

  • Best open-weight frontend result on Arena WebDev Frontend (1643, rank 8)
  • Vision2Web 64.0 - a directly frontend-relevant visual web-dev score
  • LiveCodeBench v6 91.9 and SWE-bench Pro 62.5% at $0.15/$0.47
  • 125B total / 6B active parameters makes self-hosting comparatively cheap

Tradeoffs

  • Qwen Community License 1.0 restricts commercial MaaS use without a separate agreement
  • Native context is 262K, not 1M - reaching 1M needs config changes when self-hosted
  • The weights and the hosted API are documented as different artifacts, so benchmarks may not transfer
  • Only 1,720 Arena votes

Score profile

visual 78 · code 79 · agentic 76 · debug 72 · context 82 · speed 76 · value 97

Linked evidence

Evidence source 1 ↗Evidence source 2 ↗Evidence source 3 ↗Evidence source 4 ↗Evidence source 5 ↗Evidence source 6 ↗
Compare this model on the full scoreboard

Use the same published data, filters, and side-by-side metrics.

Open comparison view →