6 reviewed records · 0 benchmark observations · capture dates not recorded
Inspect the evidenceWarp · TOOL PROFILE
Warp
Agentic development environment
No editorial score yet — missing data is not a low score
How scoring worksCheck current plans before you buy
Where this comes fromAI IDEs and copilots peer board is provisional. No quality rank is published until the declared evidence basket clears. Method AIS-V2
At a glance
5 facts- Provider
- Warp
- Type
- AI tool
- Access
- Proprietary desktop and cloud product with Agent CLI; public repository contains AGPL-3.0 and MIT components, while Enterprise offers self-hosted agents and BYOLLM.
- Lifecycle
- Active; public repository lists a Jun 3, 2026 stable release and reviewed sources contain no archive, deprecation or successor notice.
- Pricing notes
- Free tier; $20/mo Build, $50/user/mo Business
Not recorded yet: reviewed evidence records. Gaps stay visible as gaps; nothing is filled in or estimated.
Compared with
Warp sits with Cursor (AI IDEs and copilots: Work interactively inside an editor or existing repository) and GitHub Copilot (AI IDEs and copilots: Work interactively inside an editor or existing repository). Same-job peers are listed together; this profile does not name a winner. Best AI coding tools by job
FAQ
What is Warp?
Warp is an AI tool by Warp. Catalogue job: Agentic development environment. Terminal-centered development environment with agents, workflows, and codebase context.
How does Warp compare with Cursor and GitHub Copilot?
Warp is listed for AI IDEs and copilots (“Work interactively inside an editor or existing repository”). Cursor is listed for AI IDEs and copilots (“Work interactively inside an editor or existing repository”); its catalogue best-for is Professional engineers running agent fleets on large codebases. GitHub Copilot is listed for AI IDEs and copilots (“Work interactively inside an editor or existing repository”); its catalogue best-for is Teams already standardized on GitHub. Method AIS-V2 compares peers by job. This page does not pick a winner.
What does Warp cost?
Documented catalogue note: Free tier; $20/mo Build, $50/user/mo Business. Plan terms change. This is a captured note, not a live invoice, and price is not a ranking input.
Follow the source
5 source linksEvidence & conditions
5Source links
6Reviewed records
NoneBenchmark runs
Not recordedLatest capture
- Warp pricing
warp.devDate not recorded - Warp SWE-bench Verified
warp.devDate not recorded - Warp Terminal-Bench
warp.devDate not recorded - Warp customers
warp.devDate not recorded - Warp repository
github.comDate not recorded
No comparable benchmark observations are recorded for this entry.
Reviewed records
ev-warp-adoption-2026-09-06 adoption
- conflict State
- none
- construct
- adoption.github_repository
- coverage
- 0.66
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- adoption
- id
- ev-warp-adoption-2026-09-06
- independence
- B
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- output
- adoption
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- GitHub
- quality Tier
- moderate
- reproducibility
- A
- review State
- approved
- scope
- Public repository counters observed on 2026-09-06; not a seat, user or revenue count
- source Excerpt
- The public repository displayed 62.3k stars, 5.1k forks, 140 contributors and 55 releases.
- source Type
- official_repository_page
- source Url
- https://github.com/warpdotdev/Warp
- state
- measured
- unit
- repository_snapshot
- value
- 62.3k GitHub stars, 5.1k forks, 140 contributors and 55 releases
ev-warp-capability-2026-09-06 capability
- conflict State
- none
- construct
- capability.agentic_development_environment
- coverage
- 0.82
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- capability
- id
- ev-warp-capability-2026-09-06
- independence
- C
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- output
- capability
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- Warp
- quality Tier
- moderate
- reproducibility
- A
- review State
- approved
- scope
- Current documented product and enterprise access surfaces
- source Excerpt
- Warp lists Agent CLI, cloud agents, codebase indexing, Warp Drive collaboration, self-hosted agents and BYOLLM controls.
- source Type
- first_party_product_documentation
- source Url
- https://www.warp.dev/pricing
- state
- verified
- unit
- verified_feature_set
- value
- Desktop terminal, Agent CLI, cloud agents, codebase indexing, team workflows and enterprise self-hosting or BYOLLM controls
ev-warp-pricing-2026-09-06 price
- conflict State
- resolved_billing_cadence
- construct
- price.subscription_plans
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- price
- id
- ev-warp-pricing-2026-09-06
- independence
- C
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- Warp
- quality Tier
- high
- reproducibility
- A
- review State
- approved
- scope
- Monthly and annual-billing displays; Enterprise remains custom priced
- source Excerpt
- The pricing page displays Build at 20 USD monthly or 18 USD/month billed annually, Max at 200 or 180 USD/month, and Business at 50 or 45 USD/user/month.
- source Type
- first_party_pricing
- source Url
- https://www.warp.dev/pricing
- state
- verified
- unit
- access_model
- value
- Free 0 USD/month; Build 20 USD monthly or 18 USD/month billed annually; Max 200 USD monthly or 180 USD/month billed annually; Business 50 USD/user monthly or 45 USD/user/month billed annually
ev-warp-rectangle-health-outcome-2026-09-06 user_outcomes
- conflict State
- none
- construct
- users.customer_code_generation_share
- coverage
- 0.58
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- user_outcomes
- id
- ev-warp-rectangle-health-outcome-2026-09-06
- independence
- C
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- output
- users
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- Warp
- quality Tier
- moderate
- reproducibility
- C
- review State
- approved
- scope
- Rectangle Health's internal AI teammate Rex, built on Oz; first-party customer claim without a published baseline methodology
- source Excerpt
- Rectangle Health's Rex is described as a self-improving AI teammate that now writes 54% of its own code.
- source Type
- first_party_customer_case
- source Url
- https://www.warp.dev/customers
- state
- measured
- unit
- percent_self_authored_code
- value
- 54%
ev-warp-swebench-verified-2026-09-06 quality
- conflict State
- none
- construct
- quality.swe_bench_verified
- coverage
- 0.7
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- quality
- id
- ev-warp-swebench-verified-2026-09-06
- independence
- C
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- output
- external
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- Warp
- quality Tier
- moderate
- reproducibility
- B
- review State
- approved
- scope
- First-party Warp evaluation on SWE-bench Verified; the accompanying top-five claim is source-scoped and not independently verified here
- source Excerpt
- Warp states that its agent resolved 71% of SWE-bench Verified instances autonomously.
- source Type
- first_party_benchmark
- source Url
- https://www.warp.dev/blog/swe-bench-verified
- state
- measured
- unit
- percent_instances_resolved
- value
- 71%
ev-warp-terminal-bench-011-2026-09-06 quality
- conflict State
- none
- construct
- quality.terminal_bench_v0_1_1
- coverage
- 0.72
- entity Id
- warp
- entity Type
- product
- entity Version Id
- warp@2026-09-06
- evidence Type
- quality
- id
- ev-warp-terminal-bench-011-2026-09-06
- independence
- C
- observed At
- 2026-09-06
- output
- external
- peer Group
- ai_ide_copilot
- published At
- Not documented
- publisher
- Warp
- quality Tier
- moderate
- reproducibility
- B
- review State
- approved
- scope
- First-party Warp evaluation using Terminal-Bench v0.1.1; state-of-the-art claim remains source-scoped
- source Excerpt
- Warp states that it succeeded on 52% of Terminal-Bench tests using version 0.1.1.
- source Type
- first_party_benchmark
- source Url
- https://www.warp.dev/blog/terminal-bench
- state
- measured
- unit
- percent_tests_succeeded
- value
- 52%
Source reports, measured results, and editorial assessments are separate evidence types. Source dates do not imply a new benchmark run. Capture dates are shown when recorded; otherwise we say the capture date was not recorded. Recorded dates are compared with this catalogue snapshot (Sep 11, 2026), not today’s date.
Method AIS-V2
How this page is assessed
Quality claims follow Method AIS-V2.
Money never buys rank — commercial relationships cannot change rank, eligibility, evidence quality, or publication timing.
Submit or claim a listing is free and does not skip the editorial queue.
Private · this device only