MODEL PROFILE / EDITION 2026.09
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Cost-sensitive teams that need agentic software engineering plus a free experimentation tier
Balanced model evidence score; rank 15. No rank delta is shown because there is no prior numeric snapshot.
Best for
Cost-sensitive teams that need agentic software engineering plus a free experimentation tier
Price & access
Standard $0.75 in / $3.75 out per 1M through Dec 31, 2026, then $1.50/$7.50 from Jan 1, 2027; Batch and Flex $0.375/$1.875; Priority $1.35/$6.75; caching $0.075 plus $0.50 per 1M tokens/hour storage
Evidence summary
Pricing, GA date and lifecycle are first-party Google. Context window comes only from Artificial Analysis, modalities are unstated, and the coding numbers come from OpenAI's comparison table rather than Google.
Edition status
No prior snapshot. Tracked in the September 2026 baseline.
Strengths
- DeepSWE v1.1 73.8% is second-highest in OpenAI's own cross-vendor table, above Claude Fable 5.1 (67.4%)
- $0.75/$3.75 promotional pricing plus a real free tier
- Design Arena Website 1301 is the strongest of any sub-$1 input-price model except its own siblings
- Cyber sibling shows unusually strong vulnerability-patching evidence
Tradeoffs
- Terminal-Bench 4.0 19.1% in OpenAI's table is far behind frontier agentic scores
- Arena frontend Elo (1569) sits below the older Gemini 3.7 Flash (1592)
- Google does not publish context window, max output or modalities on the model or pricing pages
- AA has no output-speed measurement yet
Score profile
visual 72 · code 73 · agentic 74 · debug 74 · context 86 · speed 80 · value 92
Linked evidence
Evidence source 1 ↗Evidence source 2 ↗Evidence source 3 ↗Evidence source 4 ↗Evidence source 5 ↗Evidence source 6 ↗Evidence source 7 ↗Evidence source 8 ↗Use the same published data, filters, and side-by-side metrics.